Choose Microsoft 365 backup around the recovery you must complete. Microsoft 365 Backup is a candidate for native protection and service-scale rollback inside the Microsoft data boundary. Veeam Data Cloud and AvePoint offer granular backup capabilities alongside Microsoft-powered recovery paths, so their exact protection mode matters. Afi.ai is relevant for searchable recovery and user-lifecycle handling. Keepit deserves attention when storage independence from the production provider is a purchasing requirement.
The central finding is that a provider’s brand does not identify where every backup copy lives. Veeam Flex and Express use different storage arrangements; AvePoint’s regular and Express offerings also differ. An external management console does not automatically mean an external copy. Conversely, keeping a copy outside production does not mean a damaged tenant can be restored without a functioning destination and suitable permissions.
Separate three recovery needs
A deleted email, a corrupted SharePoint site and a requirement to retain a departed employee’s records are different jobs. Compare item search and restore, bulk recovery scope, retained history, export and authorized access during an incident. Include Teams and other workloads explicitly instead of assuming they are covered because Exchange and SharePoint appear on a feature page.
This is separate from business computer backup, which protects endpoint data. The ownership and sharing model in our file-sharing comparison also remains relevant: a synchronized working folder and a retained recovery copy serve different purposes.
| Service | Recovery reason to shortlist | Boundary to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft 365 Backup | Native protection for Exchange, SharePoint and OneDrive | Microsoft 365 trust boundary; consumption-based protected GB |
| Veeam Data Cloud | Granular Flex protection plus an Express option | Flex isolated Azure storage and Express native storage are different paths |
| Afi.ai | Search, delegated recovery and archived-user handling | Protected users; five-user minimum; mostly-SharePoint scope needs custom terms |
| Keepit | Vendor-independent backup storage and longer retention packages | Quote-based plans; retained years and add-ons vary |
| AvePoint Cloud Backup | Granular recovery, self-service and storage choice | Regular Cloud Backup versus Microsoft-powered Express protection |
Microsoft 365 Backup
Microsoft’s current overview covers Exchange Online, SharePoint and OneDrive within the Microsoft 365 data trust boundary. It distinguishes site/account rollback from mailbox item restoration. Its table still marks some file-version restore functionality as forthcoming; do not purchase it as universally available granular file recovery. The recovery-window options currently listed include three months, six months, one year and two years, with existing policies defaulting to one year.
The charge model is US$0.15 per protected GB per month. The billable amount includes defined live, deleted and versioned content; a current mailbox-size report alone may understate it. This is a credible native protection path when the supported workload and restore scope fit. It does not supply the provider-independent storage boundary required by some buyers.
Veeam Data Cloud
Veeam’s security guide places Flex backups in Veeam-hosted Azure storage isolated from Microsoft 365 and customer infrastructure. Express uses Microsoft 365 Backup Storage inside the Microsoft environment. The same guide describes customizable Flex retention but a fixed 52-week Express window. Do not assume a newly listed native Microsoft policy option is automatically a Veeam Express entitlement.
The current commercial page uses Foundation, Advanced and Premium package names, with Premium adding Microsoft 365 disaster recovery. The advertised US$2.63 per-user monthly Foundation figure is annually billed and qualified for 251-plus users; regional pricing varies. Specify the package and protection policies together. Veeam is relevant when granular recovery and the option of a Microsoft-powered bulk-recovery path belong in one managed service, but a blended brand-level comparison would hide consequential differences.
Afi.ai
Afi’s Microsoft 365 offer includes point-in-time navigation, full-text search, exports, restore to the same or another account, and delegated or self-service recovery. Its user-lifecycle behavior is especially relevant for organizations that regularly remove accounts but need to retain their backed-up history.
The licensing rules charge protected active users with a five-user minimum, allow protecting a subset of the domain and retain archived deleted-user backups without separate user licenses. Standard-plan SharePoint coverage is not separately charged, but mostly or exclusively SharePoint protection requires a custom plan. Obtain the billing-term amount rather than flatten the pricing toggle into one number. Afi is a useful shortlist for granular recovery and account lifecycle control; the protected population and non-user data mix still need to be stated in the proposal.
Keepit
Keepit’s Microsoft 365 coverage includes Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint and Groups/Teams with search, restore and export options. Its architecture statement describes its own backup cloud as separate from production SaaS and the global hyperscalers. That is a meaningful distinction for a buyer explicitly requiring an independent storage provider.
The current pricing packages are quote-based: Core Continuity lists recovery for up to five years, while Business Resilience extends that to ten and adds multi-geo backup storage. Longer retention is an add-on rather than a reason to assume every plan includes unlimited history. Keepit fits an independence-led procurement; specify workload coverage, retained years, administrative access and the actual recovery destination. Independent access to a saved copy cannot itself restore a tenant that is unavailable.
AvePoint Cloud Backup
AvePoint’s regular Cloud Backup offer includes granular recovery, ReCenter self-service and a choice of included storage or Bring Your Own Storage. That gives IT a way to compare a managed repository with a storage arrangement selected for its own operating requirements. The chosen edition and workloads still determine the scope.
Its Express recovery offer uses Microsoft 365 Backup Storage inside the Microsoft trust boundary. Keep that distinct from the regular repository and export decision. Obtain a quote that identifies users, workloads, storage, retention and any Express protection separately. AvePoint is a candidate when storage choice and end-user recovery matter alongside a bulk-recovery option. A quote for one protection path should not be presented as the complete cost or storage architecture of the other.
Select a recovery path before signing the retention term
Start with Microsoft 365 Backup when native recovery of its supported workloads is sufficient and the trust boundary is acceptable. Compare Veeam and AvePoint when a managed service combining granular workflows and a Microsoft-powered recovery path is attractive. Consider Afi when account lifecycle and searchable delegated recovery drive the decision. Include Keepit when provider-independent storage and longer retained history are explicit requirements.
If the immediate problem is one lost document, a bulk rollback can impose unnecessary disruption. If the incident affects many sites, a file-by-file process may be operationally unsuitable. If the purpose is retained access after account removal, neither headline backup frequency nor a generic “unlimited” label answers the requirement. Require the proposal to identify the recovery object, destination, permissions, retained history and billable population. That makes these services comparable without pretending their storage boundaries or recovery promises are identical.
Prepared by Toolverly Editorial with AI-assisted research and drafting. Product and plan information checked October 22, 2026.
Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash. Read about our publication or send a correction.