An inspection is only useful if an observation leads to an understandable decision. Replacing a paper checklist with a digital form helps capture information, but operations teams also need to know who reviews a failure, who owns the corrective action, and which evidence demonstrates that the issue was resolved.
Mitti, GoAudits, SiteDocs, GoCanvas, and FORM OpX support different versions of that field-to-office workflow. This comparison focuses on recurring operational inspections, recorded observations, and follow-up evidence. Equipment repair planning is covered in our CMMS comparison; general data collection belongs in our online form builder guide.
Official sources were checked on October 16, 2026. SafetyCulture’s platform is now called Mitti, and this guide uses the current name. We did not conduct field trials or evaluate regulatory compliance. The objective is to help buyers define a workable inspection process and verify each vendor’s current commercial boundaries.
Compare capture, review, and follow-up
| Product | Best fit | Main strength | Meaningful tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitti | Teams combining inspections with broader operations | Checklists, issue capture, analytics, and connected work | Seat, site, plan, and AI allowances need distinction |
| GoAudits | Teams needing structured scored inspections | Mobile auditing, reports, and action plans | Advanced control depends on the higher plan |
| SiteDocs | Company-wide safety documentation | Worker access, signed forms, and certification records | Annual company-sized quote and optional services |
| GoCanvas | Field teams needing configurable data workflows | Offline forms and tailored PDF outputs | Follow-up and integration scope varies by tier |
| FORM OpX | Organizations implementing complex inspection logic | Mobile forms, logic, workflows, and reporting | Package minimums and scoping require confirmation |
Mitti
Mitti, formerly the SafetyCulture platform, connects digital inspections with issue reporting, tasks, training, and operational analytics. That breadth is useful when a failed observation needs to become visible work rather than remain a note in a completed checklist. The current product material explicitly connects inspection evidence and follow-up activities.
The pricing page lists a Free plan for teams of up to ten with five active inspection templates. Premium is $24 per seat per month billed annually or $29 billed monthly, excluding applicable taxes. Enterprise is custom quoted. A separate location-based offer provides fixed pricing per site with unlimited users, so do not mix that agreement with the ordinary seat model.
Strength: a broad operating environment around the inspection. Limitation: plan features, API allowances, and AI credits have boundaries. The platform’s wider capabilities do not mean every feature is included without additional usage or configuration.
Shortlist Mitti when inspections should feed a wider operational routine. Ask an evaluator to record a problem, assign responsibility, attach closure evidence, and find that history later. Choose the smallest workflow that makes ownership clear before enabling more automation.
GoAudits
GoAudits focuses on mobile inspections, scored checklists, immediate reports, and action plans. Its combination of mobile capture and a web portal suits teams that repeatedly inspect similar sites and need comparable observations without manually assembling reports after each visit.
Starter is listed at $10 per user per month and Enterprise at $30 per user per month with annual billing selected. The page offers monthly billing separately. Starter includes one company or department, 25 locations, and ten checklist templates; Enterprise expands those limits and adds advanced permissions, scheduling, reporting, and trends.
Strength: a direct inspection-to-report workflow with specific entry-plan limits. Limitation: a basic inspection may fit Starter while the management controls required for a wider rollout need Enterprise. Single sign-on is marked for separate pricing discussion.
GoAudits is a strong evaluation candidate when consistency across recurring inspections is the main need. Pilot a checklist with a conditional question, an annotated photo, and a failed item requiring follow-up. Make sure a score cannot conceal the significance of one critical failure, and verify that the report carries enough context for a person who was not present.
SiteDocs
SiteDocs emphasizes a company-wide safety documentation program. Its pricing description includes worker logins, unlimited forms and signatures, and tracking of worker signatures and certifications. That makes it relevant when inspection records need to sit beside the people and documentation associated with the work.
The annual subscription is based on company size and requires an initial call for a tailored quote. The official pricing material also distinguishes optional capabilities such as Analytics and Workflow Studio. Obtain the complete scope rather than assuming every connected feature is part of the base agreement.
Strength: broad worker participation and continuing records, rather than a narrow inspector-only workflow. Limitation: the buyer needs a company-level quote and a clear implementation plan. An unlimited-form allowance does not decide which forms should exist or how revisions should be approved.
Shortlist SiteDocs when signed safety records and worker documentation are central. Ask how a supervisor identifies the applicable form version and retrieves the relevant signed record. Evaluate access for workers joining or leaving a site and establish who maintains certification information. The software can organize evidence, while the organization must still define its own review responsibilities.
GoCanvas
GoCanvas supports configurable field forms, offline mobile access, photo capture, dispatch, and PDF reporting. Its broader form-and-workflow model is useful when an inspection needs a specific output or must pass through several people before the office accepts the record.
The current packages page lists Essentials at $29, Pro at $39, and Max at $49 per user per month, each with a three-user minimum and annual billing. Essentials includes configurable PDF reports and offline access. Pro adds multi-user workflows and API access; Max adds follow-up tasks, live data sources, departments, and single sign-on.
Strength: flexibility in field capture and the resulting document. Limitation: the workflow capabilities are not identical across tiers. A team that needs formal follow-up tasks should not budget only for the entry package.
Choose GoCanvas for evaluation when the field record has to become a usable office document or connected workflow. Include a form that starts offline and requires a supervisor’s contribution. Confirm how synchronization, permissions, and PDF revisions behave. Custom integrations and analytics are advertised as add-ons, so quote them separately from the user subscription.
FORM OpX
FORM OpX targets operational audits and inspections with a form builder, business logic, mobile entry, and reporting. Its Essentials description includes offline mode, photo capture and markup, manual exports, and native mobile applications. Pro adds tasks, workflows, dashboards, and more implementation support.
The dedicated OpX pricing page lists Essentials starting at $299 per month with a ten-user minimum and Pro starting at $999 per month including 30 users. Enterprise is custom priced and adds capabilities such as API access and single sign-on. Confirm billing term and exact user treatment in the agreement.
Strength: room for more structured inspection logic and a scoped rollout. Limitation: package minimums and implementation detail make a simple per-user headline misleading. The general FORM pricing overview presents a different starting reference; obtain a written quote tied to the specific OpX package.
Shortlist OpX when inspection complexity and workflow design justify a more involved implementation. Ask the vendor to model one exception-heavy checklist, including a repeat inspection and an unresolved action. Decide who can change the form logic and how those changes affect comparable results across sites.
Evaluate a finding through verified closure
Start with one recurring inspection and define what a pass, failure, and not-applicable answer mean. Include the identity of the inspected location, the person collecting evidence, the form version, and the expected review. A long checklist with ambiguous answers produces inconsistent records regardless of the software.
During a proposed pilot, capture a failed observation with a photograph and an explanation. Give the corrective action to a different person, record their response, and have a supervisor review the closure evidence. Then retrieve the complete sequence from the office. This is an evaluation design, not a claim that we performed the exercise on these products.
Also simulate poor connectivity using disposable records. Confirm which templates are available before leaving coverage, whether attachments synchronize, and how staff recognize an incomplete upload. Keep inspection completion separate from issue closure: a submitted checklist should not make an unresolved observation disappear from attention.
- Define observation severity, ownership, deadlines, and acceptable closure evidence.
- Check offline capture and later synchronization for required devices.
- Compare template, site, user, attachment, and history limits.
- Quote reviewer access, analytics, API connections, and implementation separately.
- Keep a documented export and form revision process.
Mitti suits a wider operations routine; GoAudits suits repeated structured inspections; SiteDocs suits worker-centered safety records; GoCanvas suits configurable field-to-office documents; and FORM OpX suits complex logic with scoped implementation. Choose the workflow that makes the next action and its owner visible, then verify that the evidence remains usable after the inspection is over.
Official sources
Checked October 16, 2026: Mitti platform and name change, Mitti pricing, GoAudits plans, SiteDocs pricing, SiteDocs package questions, GoCanvas packages, FORM OpX pricing, and FORM overview pricing.
Photo by JESHOOTS.COM on Unsplash. Read about our publication or send a correction.