A recruitment agency should buy around the placement it must deliver, then price the recruiter seats, automation consumption and back-office work needed to deliver it. Bullhorn offers several front-office and front-to-back packages. Recruit CRM combines plan entitlements with a shared credit pool. Loxo separates its core record system from a wider sourcing and agent workforce. Access Vincere Evo makes team size and optional modules central to the quote. JobAdder distinguishes permanent recruitment from temporary workflows and advanced automation. The cheapest ATS seat can leave the most expensive part of an agency workflow outside the purchase.
What the buying decision includes
Start with one operating model: permanent placement, retained search, or temporary and contract staffing. Define who owns the client opportunity, candidate record, submission, placement and any approved time that becomes an invoice. An employer hiring its own staff has a different problem. Count recruiters separately from occasional client reviewers, and identify existing sourcing subscriptions, job-board agreements, communication charges and payroll systems. A sourcing database, an AI credit and a completed placement are different units; an unlimited candidate record allowance does not make all three unlimited.
| Product | Reason to shortlist | Commercial boundary | Resolve before purchase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bullhorn | Staffing front office with a path into pay and bill | Small-agency, larger-agency and Salesforce families | Which exact family and back-office scope? |
| Recruit CRM | ATS/CRM with configurable paid consumption | Seats plus pooled feature credits | What consumes credits beyond the license? |
| Loxo | Combine records with external sourcing and agents | Core versus Professional versus Enterprise | Which sourcing, capacity and governance tier? |
| Access Vincere Evo | Agency tiers tied to team size | Startup/Core rolling terms; optional modules | Which add-ons and seven-seat boundary apply? |
| JobAdder | Agency workflow progression and integrations | Lite, Essential, Pro; standard annual contract | Are temp workflows and API included? |
Bullhorn
Bullhorn lists Starter and Core for small agencies, with Pro and Max adding different AI capabilities. Its larger-agency Front Office plans are separate, while Bullhorn One adds timesheets, invoicing and pay-and-bill automation. Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud is another family built on Salesforce. Treat those as distinct proposals rather than assuming that every Bullhorn logo describes one interchangeable subscription. Bullhorn official source.
Shortlist Bullhorn when front-office recruitment must connect to a defined staffing back office. A permanent-placement boutique may need much less scope than a contractor agency. Ask the supplier to name the package, implementation work and every bridge to finance. The public entry seat figures alone do not establish your billing commitment, taxes or complete implementation scope. Compare a written configuration; do not use a Starter seat to represent Bullhorn One or Recruitment Cloud. Bullhorn official source.
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM publishes Pro, Business and Enterprise with account-wide credit pools. The current page lists 100, 200 and 2,000 included credits per user per month respectively. Some capabilities are included in the license, while sourcing, enrichment, workflow automation and selected communications consume credits. Business adds features including open API, SSO, roles and a 30-day audit history. Recruit CRM official source.
This suits an agency willing to manage consumption alongside seats. Build the quote around its actual mix of research, outreach, reporting and active contractors, rather than treating every credit as one candidate or message. Timesheets consume credits per active contractor; the page describes marginal contractor tiers. Its interactive prices and controls need a confirmed currency and billing selection, so a single scraped rate is not a dependable whole-agency quote. More included credits matter only if the required features and expected consumption match. Recruit CRM official source.
Loxo
Loxo now lists Core as its ATS and CRM of record, with natural-language search and unlimited jobs, candidates and companies. Professional adds its external talent graph, agent workforce and API access, with 2,500 monthly credits per seat pooled across the team. Enterprise adds SSO/SAML and advanced governance. Core and Professional use annual plans paid upfront; the advertised Core starting offer is time-limited for new customers. Loxo official source.
Compare Loxo when sourcing and candidate engagement should share the recruitment database. An agency keeping its own sourcing stack should examine Core before paying for a broader replacement. Conversely, Core search is not evidence that the full external sourcing service is included. The page explicitly calls its capacity illustrations figurative and marks scheduling and deduplication as coming soon. Do not turn those illustrations into guaranteed completed searches or buy against an unavailable feature. Price the necessary credit capacity and governance edition together. Loxo official source.
Access Vincere Evo
Access Vincere Evo publishes a one-user Startup plan at GBP 150 per month and Core for two to seven users at GBP 95 per user per month, on 30-day rolling contracts. Pro is tailored to the agency. The detailed comparison identifies additional-fee modules, including AI functions, temporary/contract management and implementation; Pro also offers optional pay and bill, client portal and multi-brand support. Access Vincere Evo official source.
The shorter Startup and Core commitment can be useful for an agency with uncertain headcount. However, several prominent AI and back-office descriptions refer to optional additions. Obtain the included modules in writing, along with taxes and migration charges. The page labels Pro as seven-plus users while its explanation says above seven, so a seven-seat buyer should resolve that boundary rather than infer the cheaper tier. A lower seat rate does not establish a lower invoice once required contractor operations are added. Access Vincere Evo official source.
JobAdder
JobAdder lists Recruiter Lite, Essential and Pro. Its current comparison places permanent-only recruiting and a single job workflow in Lite; Essential adds permanent and temporary workflows, open API access and more automation. Pro adds Roi-AI, custom analytics and a sandbox. The FAQ states that annual contracts are standard even when payments are monthly. Pricing is requested from the supplier. JobAdder official source.
Shortlist JobAdder when workflow progression matters more than assembling separate tools. A team adding a temporary desk should price Essential or above rather than extrapolate from Lite. Specify its required integrations and the distinction between a feature that is included and one merely available for purchase. The Hiring Manager Portal is presented as a recommended add-on, not a universal inclusion. Existing indexed descriptions show older headcount bands; use the current plan comparison and a written migration scope for the actual agency. JobAdder official source.
Which purchase fits your operation?
For a staffing operation that needs time-to-invoice continuity, compare a fully scoped Bullhorn proposal with Access Vincere Evo including its required modules. For a sourcing-led agency, compare Recruit CRM consumption with Loxo Professional capacity. For a team choosing a structured progression from permanent into temporary recruitment, examine JobAdder edition gates. Keep the final choice tied to the agency workflow and its complete bill, not the number of AI labels.
Before signing, have each proposal follow one assignment from a new client opportunity through a candidate submission to a placed worker. For contractor work, extend that written scope to approved time and the invoice. Record which system owns each change and which subscriptions remain. This exposes an omitted handoff without pretending that a feature list proves the agency can remove its existing tools.
For related decisions, compare applicant tracking for employers hiring their own staff and sales commission management when recruiter incentives need a separate system.
By Toolverly Editorial, with AI-assisted research and drafting. Product information checked November 3, 2026.
Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash. Read about our publication or send a correction.